Snowflake leftists believe that merely recognizing that there are differences between the races is “racist.” Talk to any libtard or leftist and you will see this absurdity being perpetuated. But acknowledging that races are different and that each race has its own strengths and weaknesses is not the least bit “racist” – it is the mere acceptance of reality and science.
Everybody knows that Asians, particularly East Asians (Chinese, Taiwanese, etc.) and Japanese, are on average very intelligent and high-IQ. They excel particularly in the maths and sciences. For whatever reason, their brains have evolved to emphasize numbers and mathematical solutions. The stereotype of the geeky, scrawny, bespectacled Asian nerd that you want to copy from in math and science class is largely true.
It’s apparent that when it comes to race, recognizing the positive attributes of non-white races is allowed, but noting the strengths of whites as a race is lampooned as white supremacy. For example, most people are very willing to accept that negroes are superior to other races in athletics, especially basketball and short-distance sprinting. That’s obviously true. Negroes dominate the NBA, NFL and 100-meter dash sprinting because their muscles are built in a way that gives them an edge over other races in running and jumping activities. But if you note the weaknesses of negroes, most notably their lower IQs which translates consistently into poor academic performances among them, then it’s called racist hate speech.
An evil double standard exists where only the negative traits of whites are allowed to be stated. If anything positive is said about whites as a race, like our creative genius and faustian spirit to explore and discover new things, it’s attacked by the left as an expression of white supremacy. The left goes so far as to deny the existence of whites as an ethnic group, forwarding the asinine fiction that “race is a social construct,” while shilling for the cultural and racial empowerment of non-white minorities in white societies.
The left champions and lobbies for institutional racism and discrimination against whites, particularly white males, while fronting as anti-racist social justice warriors. Their unfettered anti-white nature shines through when discussing the example of apartheid South Africa. The leftists of the day argued that the apartheid government of South Africa should be deposed because a minority should never rule over a majority population. Whites, they said, had no right as a minority to govern the negro majority in South Africa. The negroes were entitled to shape the political, economic and cultural future of South Africa as the majority ethnic group, said the leftists. Yet in white nations leftists reverse their argument, assailing the white majority’s domination of politics, economy and culture as “white privilege,” whilst advocating for the empowerment of minorities in the ruling structures.
This meretricious double standard exposes the left as antagonistic agitators against all things white and Western. Far from “anti-racist,” their ultimate goal is to impair the white man’s right to self-determination in his own native land and to supplant white cultures with either non-white ones or an amorphous globalist melting pot filled with androgynous trannies and freaks of all sorts. This sinister attack against whites couldn’t be more obvious.